Australian National
(anotd)
Saturday 25th July 1998
This on-line paper is now archived for perpetuity in the
National Library
of Australia
Subscriber's password
check (have your subscription number handy)
Subscribers get free access to the monthly "The
Strategy" on-line from April 1998.
Recent stories exclusive to
(how to)
subscribe/rs of the Australian National News of the Day now at the
bottom of this page.
"ON NOW" weekly abbreviated anotd
fax-back
-
Dial: 1902 211037 and follow the instructions.
(Note: costs 0.75 c per minute will be billed to your phone account
under "ON NOW NEWS LETTER")
Current topical links (available to all readers):
[Links to the MAI]
[One Nation on-line
DISCUSSION forum] [One
Nation Federal Web Site]
Archive of weekly features (available to all
readers):
[The
Canberra Column]
[Economic
Rationalism]
Today's
Headlines
an Aussie's viewpoint on Australia's
first daily Internet newspaper.
Since
October 1995
Between the One Nation lines
Tomorrow a group of One Nation supporters and members will take on Labor's
Grahame Richardson in a 60 Minutes interview looking at Australia's
future.
The confrontation (of sorts) will take place in the Parliamentary Annex in
Brisbane and is expected to be aired tomorrow night.
The Jewish Lobby, Tax, Laurie Brereton MP, Malcolm Turnbull,
Neville Wran, Darling Harbour and Labor
Some documents have fallen off the back of the proverbial truck.
The supplier of the material fears for his life. You will understand why. He
has sent an unknown informant a whole pile of evidence which could have major implications
on a number of very rich people in Australia.
From this link the recipient has started putting
a few of the pieces together pieces which reveal some damning evidence
implicating some very high profile Labor politicians amongst others.
Note, if I get hit the information
carried on this page
and related pages that I believe will be posted shortly should be the primary suspect in any subsequent investigation... please record the overseas link carrying this information for record keeping purposes.
The holes in the Australian Constitution
Aspects of Australian
history the government does not want you to know about. The Australian
Constitution is UK legislation and was extinguished at independence on 10
January 1920. To understand more about how politicians have conned the Australian
people, read on!
This is a very interesting page that you should only visit when you have
a free hour up your proverbial sleeve.
Alan Jones on the organisers behind the student
protests
Here
is an extract:
Well it's not been a good week for democracy in this
country.
Last Sunday in Melbourne a rally by a legitimate and
registered political party had to cancelled because a group of screaming
thugs launched a violent attack on free speech.
Well it gets worse.
And a
parent's first hand experience of the "schooly" protests:
'Resistance' organized the 'Fight the System' rally in Adelaide, Apparently,
the 'System' consists of not only Hanson's One Nation but also Howard, Liberals,
Labor & Big Business. Although I think the schoolies were mostly there
to fight fascism or something? I overheard this conversation between two
young things.
"What is our chant again ?"
"Hanson is a fascist."
"What?"
"Hanson is a fascist."
"What is a fascist ?"
"Hitler"
"What ?"
"Hitler, you know, Adolf Hitler ''
"No."
Laboral's treasury masters at work
Here
is an extract:
WHEN Paul Keating was Treasurer, Dr Ken Henry was his
adviser on taxation. Henry was - and is - no grey faceless public servant;
he was often seen around Parliament House driving his black, 1930s Citroën
"Light 15" - a gangster-style car with flared front mudguards. He added to
the distinctive look with black sunglasses, a charcoal suit and matching
Blues Brothers hat.
When things got fraught during the 1993 election campaign,
Keating adopted more than Henry's advice - he took on some of his image as
well. He donned Ray-Bans for the cover of Rolling Stone magazine and
turned himself into a blues icon. It was quite a contrast to the dry John
Hewson and his 15per cent GST.
Now, Henry is the brains behind the Federal Government's
tax reform plans, despite being unknown to the public.
Working with him is another former Keating adviser
and veteran of the 1985 tax summit, Greg Smith, whose political nous has
earned him the job of devising the Government's $10million marketing campaign
for a GST.
Making the
news" -
an indepth exposé of media and political collusion at the highest
possible levels in Australia.
Political:
You say:
Subject:
Keep up your
cause
Just like school teachers from other countries to push
our children against the country they are being paid from. Califonria is
the same way we are fighting against immigration and all their pushing into
our state and federal jobs. They only help their own and people can't be
misled. We will be a 3rd world country if they get their way. We are really
not one world, we have all been raised differently. Ask if the children are
getting an A on their report cards to picket your party. In the 60s' we had
this at all our colleges, when Clinton was in Russia and smoking his one
marijuana cigarette. They never change, the hippie movement must die and
keep some moral fibre in our countries. This is not racism they are terrorists
trying to unseat everything our countries have been founded on.
Sincerely,
E. Petersen
San Bernardino, CA. 92413
Skpeaking about Aboriginies or however you spell it,
maybe they can start some casinos for gambling like the indians have done
here and want to take over the whole country through gambling rights of tribes.
We are against gambling in California and the indians are opening up their
reservations to gambling so they can raise money from retired americans to
fight the laws of our states. Watch out the indians in your country will
do the same, not on their own but with help from investors.
Subject:
Victorian
Riots
Scott,
I was saddened to read that the misguided few are at
it again protesting on untrue issues spawned by our national media and the
vested interests. If some-one doesen't find a bit of backbone and put these
people in their place, the country will slide into anarchy.
We only have ourselves to blame for the present day
situation, we were warned, for many years people like Jeremy Lee has been
lecturing and writing books on the subject but we took no notice until it
was nearly too late. The road back is going to be rough but if Australia
is to be rescued from the clutches of greedy and inept politicians we will
just have to put up with the bumps.
Hooroo,
Alan Esson.
Subject: Laboral Revealed
Dear Sir,
Yesterday on ANOTD I made some disparaging remarks
about Malcolm Fraser and I had a sleepless night over it.
Malcolm is a truly great Australian and I was
wrong.
Malcolm confirmed it this morning when I heard on the
news that he has suggested to John Howard that the Coalition "form a Government
with Labor in order to stop One Nation".
Well done Mal....I told you he was a truly great
Australian.
Gee, I wish I had thought of that first.
Is this guy really an ex Coalition Prime Minister of
Australia or did I miss something in the 70's & 80's?
Somebody tell me I didn't here what I though t I
heard.
Allan W. Doak
Subject: Comments on Australian News of the
Day
Who is this Malcolm Pantsdown person, anyway? The idiocy
of Labour and Liberal working together is too funny to be taken seriously.
Could you imagine Johnny and Kimmy smiling and shaking hands while their
left hands held long knives behind their backs?
I listened to Mal talk about the "evils" of One Nation.
This, from a man who masterminded the removal of a democratically elected
Government.
Can't any of these politically correct dopes see, that
if Australians don't want Pauline Hanson then they won't vote for her? If
people do want to vote for Hanson or any of One Nation candidates, then how
is it any business of Mad Mal??
from
Wags
Subject: Fraser/Beazely
One Nation doesn't seem to be getting as many Labor
voters as switching support as Liberal voters. Beazely has certainly let
the side down badly. He still doesn't seem to realise that if anyone is
responsible for the rise of One Nation - It's him! Opposition leader indeed,
he provided no opposition and left the people with no-where to go to voice
concern. Labor voters need to wake up that that Beazely is going to be another
Howard. The difference between the Major parties is negligible, as Mr.
Fraser pointed out. Labor Government ran to Globalism/Level playing
field/privatisation and Howard continued with ear muffs and blinkers. Evan's
is totally globalist, and now we have Fraser trying to pave the way for
Labor/Liberal Coalition after the next election so they can continue Globalism
and the sale of Telstra. One Nation would now have to win 50 % of the
vote outright to beat Labor and Liberal. If One Nation received 40% and the
majors got 30% each, for simplified example, Liberal/Labor could still form
Government having both lost to a new party. What use is democracy? When the
people could clearly prefer one party over another two, then the two losers
steal the peoples wishes to continue the program that has turned people against
them.
Mr. Fraser, your proposition could divide the nation
for the first time since ... er ..when was the last time? 1975!!! (funny
about that) And he says he stands for unity! Power for his agenda at any
cost more like it.
T.Shaw
Subject: J. Shinkfield &
Multiculturalism
Hi,
Hmm......looks like there's little more to discuss
when we both see each others viewpoint as racist.
As a first generation Australian of non Anglo-Saxon
racial background, having travelled to many different countries and mixing
daily with people of many races, I remain convinced that those attacking
PHON have got it wrong. The fact that so many of them have to resort to lies,
slander and violence against PHON instead of rational debate raises concerns
as to how entrenched the multiculturalism industry is and how morally corrupt
political opportunists are.
When my parents immigrated to Australia they did so
knowing that they were leaving their ties to their cultural identity behind
as their new homeland was assimilating immigrants into their culture. Naturally
they still practice some of their former cultural lifestyle and some of it
has passed onto myself. But, as a first generation Australian I identify
more with the Australian culture than with that of my parents. Assimilation
has successfully built a great nation with a distinct culture which I was
quite surprised that you questioned.
With multiculturalism, Australians are being divided
according to race, and we have already seen evidence of conflicts between
ethnic groups, and calls for removal of Australian traditions to accomodate
intolerant multiculturalists. Contrast that with Pauline Hanson inviting
immigrants to become one with our people and culture.
Regarding family values and the birth rate, I have
heard that the divorce rate is nearer to 50%, marriage is on the decline
and singles are on the increase and many people are saying it's too expensive
to have a family. Also, industry is so productivity driven that they become
anti-family ( I have actually seen this at my work ). Hardly a promising
place to bring children into.
Regards,
Peter W.
Subject:
MAI
The dangers proposed by this agreement and the 20 year
binding nature make it a dangerous piece of work. The only groups that could
concievably find this attractive are those who know they will directly benefit
from the outcome. For Australia to place itself in with the same arena as
the mega economies of Europe and the US is sheer stupidity. The economic
weight of these countries will totally dominate the local economy. Closer
ties are one thing domination is somthing totally different.
Marian S.
Subject: Hello Pauline!
We are with you.
Victor Mishenko
Donetsk, Ukraine
Subject: Pauline
my name is bradley rilen and i'm 25 years of age and
a great supporter of one nation i think pauline hanson is doing a great job
for australia and really look forward to see more of pauline in the
future.
go get em pauline one nation will win the battle.
brad
Subject: your mailing list!
Hi!
I love pauline hanson and this web site! it's great.
I would like to be informed and want to join the One Nation mailing list...
NOW!
thanks
jane manson
Subject:
Discussion
forum.
Scott,
Lets have a forum for political action. Most of the
people that respond to your site are expressing supportive opinions.
How about trying to assemble a group of supporters
who are prepared to are prepared to establish an attack team to take on the
contraforces that threaten our country and its democratic system.
You reference the CRIMES ACT 1914 - SECT 28 Interfering
with political liberty . ok - so howdo we turn the crimes act against the
likes of the anti democrat malcolm fraser and the socialists who are mobilising
the school kids against ON. We've had Qantas, channel 10 in perth and Liebler
trying to knock us out.
How do we counter these propagandarists? I'm looking
for a forumof people who know the system and can legally work within it to
push back these forces of anti democracy? What is needed is a legal counterforce
capability that is capable of playing very, very, but legal, hard ball.
Your forum is good in that it reveals that ON supporters
have are "average" Australians who have many fair and reasonable reasosons
for supporting ON. But what about he peoplethat are really pissed of with
the anti democracy rhetoric that is flung at ON. I'm really pissed off, not
that isupport every ON policy item, but I am reallly bugged by my countrymens
lack of political tolerance.
I'd like see a working group established that could
find the ways and means to legally challenge these contraforces.
Any ideas?
I dont think that sending emails to the public relations
departments of Qantas or JetSet get anywhere. Maybe if we sent letters to
their lawyers (preferrably the New york or Londondon offices of their lawyers)
would count for more because (maybe & I'm guessing here) the lawyers
would? have an obligation to forward these communications to their clients
at cost. lawyers especially american lawyers ar'nt cheap and this would put
a financial cost on opposing the australain democratic process. Just an
idea.
Also how abut a black list on australian orgs that
oppose ON on the web? My knowledge of the behaviour of Managing Directors
suggests that this would terrify them.
Fraser is in bed with the Communist Chinese - why dont
we have a Malcolm Fraser web page and list all the human rights abuses in
China on it with his picture?. You can get this from amnesty or the Moslems
or the Tibetans.
Surely ON has one lawyer amongst his suppoters. Can
we not harness hiss knowledge?
Regards,
Joe Otway
Subject: Need help?
Hi,
My name is Dominic Sidor and I am living in Moorabbin,
Mebourne, Victoria. There is on suburb such as Redfern in Sydney here. It's
called Springvale. Every house contains Asians, Vietnamese to be exact. I
can see Asians moving into surrounding suburbs and it's frighteneing. Every
day I see more and more Asians walking on Moorabbin's streets.
Dominic Sidor
Subject: Deja Vu
Some time ago I wrote saying I believe that no matter
what the Polititians did or when they held the Federal election it would
make no difference to the fact that One Nation exists and that the longer
the election was delayed , the more time would be available for Australians
to become convinced that there is another alternative to the deceitful,
self-rewarding, business men Polititians that presently govern[?] our once
great country. It is a fact that now many,many Australians support Pauline
Hanson's One Nation Party and the numbers grow every day. I read pretty well
everything, and the un-supported attacks on O.N. are just about the dirtiest
example of twisted facts I have ever seen. Also the way the authorities and
the media have let themselves become puppets to Polititians is very sad.
It is simply a fact that time and reality have caught up with the way the
Polititians have allowed [for their own interests] our country to run off
the tracks and slowly degenerate to what it is to-day. I have to believe
that a lot of it was unintentional and that some things just got out of hand
and slowly but surely became the mess it is to-day. But human nature being
as it is the existing Polititians cannot repair things without losing face
and exposing themselves to well-deserved criticisions. Also International
bodies who were able to talk them into signing ridiculous aggreements to
the detriment of Ausrtralia would also easily talk them out of making corrective
changes that would enable us to become independant again. I have heard it
said that 70% of people are sheep and that they need someone to lean on and
lead them. Well, I don't believe that, but I must say that I am amazed at
how many people believe and take at face value the information given to them
by the the two bodies who are known all over the world for their deceit and
manipulation of facts ,and of courseI mean the Polititians and the
Media.
Surely by now most thinking people must know that that
Pauline Hanson is NOT raceist and it is the Media that claim she is just
to create a source of controversial news and improve market sales. Also it
is plainly evident that as far as the Australian Aboriginal is concerned
Pauline Hanson only wants to control the alleged corruption in Atsic and
similiar bodies to ensure that a fair distribution of funds occur and that
the needy Aboriginal gets looked after.
It is obvious to me that some Australian.businesses
and pretty well all Polititians in the other parties are very frightened
of exposure and of having their privialiged positions taken away from them
and are therefore fighting tooth and nail for survival and will do and say
anything to discredit One Nation and their personal attacks on Pauline Hanson
are shameful and un-Australian.
Up till the last Qld. election I and my family ALWAYS
voted for the conservative Parties both State and Federal and for many years
we wished for John Howard to be our Prime Minister.But sadly , when it happened
he exposed himself for what he really is and we are so disappointed . So,
ON,ON, Pauline and Co. Congratulations and thank you for being here.
Dan Stuart
P.S. I own a gun and I vote.
Subject: Re: Hanson for PM
TO:
Jan R Pearson,
USA
Most interesting comments from Jan yesterday. From
watching Sesame street recently I thought that all Americans were black already!
There was not a single white face on the show.
Gordon Briggs
Subject: Comments on Australian News of the
Day
Tony Miles wrote:
> Pauline Hanson. I've read some of her speeches.
I've read some of the replies. I've read what people have to > say about
her, both for and against. I've now come to this conclusion. >She has
found a voice amongst the misinformed minority. There are 'Pauline Hansons'
to be found in every > corner of society and the globe. They say what
they think based on what they understand and the angle from > which they
can see. Their intellects and view of the world are limited by the depth
of their experience.
Yes well Tony, everybody "says what they think based
on what they understand". There's nothing terribly bad or unique about that.
Similarly, everybody speaks from their own point of view - "the angle from
which they can see". Everybody is limited by their own experience, education
and research. Nothing unique about that. Show me someone that doesn't apply
to.
It is every person's right... Nay, it is every person's
DUTY, to vote for the party which will benefit them the most, from the angle
they see things from - that is from their own circumstance. That way, the
maximum level of benefit will in theory be delivered to the Australian
people.
Now you say that her supporters are "misinformed".
Well it takes a bit more intellectual will power to disagree with the majority
- to not follow the
Calf Path that everybody else is. Those who go against
what is politically correct have at least gone through the mental exercise
of figuring out for themselves what is what.
But if Pauline's supporters are so "mis-informed",
then where are all the "informed" people who would tell them where they are
wrong? We see a lot of name-calling, personal attacks and physical
violence. Where are all the facts that One Nation are carelessly
ignoring?
Like, I'm willing to support a GST. Just tell me FIRST
what the benefits are for me. Go on please tell. Yes I know the current system
is stuffed. But tell me why a GST will help. Yeh, not JUST why, but also
PROVE it. Show me the statistics from one of the many other countries with
a GST. Seen any policians bandying about facts lately? No, didn't think
so.
Or tell me how it is better to save a few percent
on fuel, sugar, pork etc, when it will lead to an ever exploding welfare
bill for the taxpayer. Yes "Mr. Informed", please enlighten us backward
children.
Or tell us why we need to turn our
telecommunications over to foreign interests (Optus + sell Telstra etc).
We havn't seen any major improvment in our telecommunications from competition.
But what we have seen could equally have been accomplished through having
a couple of AUSTRALIAN telcos competing against each other. Instead of the
Optus debacle, all the Govt. needed to do was split Telstra into several
competing entities. Telstra-A and Telstra-B if you will. Let the CEOs of
each company compete for the biggest salary bonus for making a profit. Meanwhile
the profits go back into the Australian people's benefit. But oh no, thats
too "simplistic" and "uninformed".
Or tell us, "Mr Informed", why a country with
more resources, both natural and otherwise per capita, than ANY OTHER COUNTRY
on the face of the earth should face a continually deteriorating economic
position compared to other countries. Australia used to be #1 in living
standards. How far we have slipped! So tell us, "Mr Informed" why more of
the same makes sense. When you put your hand in the fire and it hurts, most
people have the common sense to pull it out again. Why oh why not us?
So when you accuse me of "saying what I think based
on what I understand"...
My simplistic, populist, "uninformed", "unplanned"
answer is --- OK.
Name Withheld
Subject: LETTER FROM TONY MILES
I almost let this letter slip by without comment, but
then felt that would be another sign of the apathy which affected this nation
IN THE PAST. Tony states "She(Pauline)has been found to quote facts and figures
that are unsubstantiated and untrue in many cases."
Now Tony, it's your turn. Please support these statements
of yours with facts and figures.
1. "She has found a voice amongst the misinformed
minority." Please tell us specifically what we are misinformed about.
2. "Their intellects and view of the world are limited
by the depth of their experience." I agree this is generally true of everyone,
including yourself. However please tell us the view of the world and the
depth of experience of each of the One Nation supporters.
Another interesting comment is in regard to this website.
Tony proclaims, "You cannot absolve yourselves from blame if people react
negatively to your action and by publishing you are actively taking part
in the debate." This activity was once known as free speech! Since there
are two sides in most debates do you agree that people with opposing views
to the One Nation stance cannot absolve themselves from blame if people react
negatively to their actions? By admitting that there is a debate are you
lowering yourself to our intellect or have we been raised to yours?
Something else you can help me with. When people with
such great intellectual capacity as yourself go to vote, do you follow the
How to Vote cards of your Party or do you make your own independent decision.
Come on, tell the truth.
Bob Thompson
Subject: Racism
Racism according to my dictionaries: "a doctrine or
teaching, WITHOUT SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT claiming racial differences in character
or intelligence, to assert SUPERIORITY of one race over another or others;
to maintain the purity of a race or races...any programme or practice of
discrimination or segregation BASED ON THOSE BELIEFS."
Of course I am reluctant to quote any dictionary these
days, as men with "itching ears" are quick to change the meanings and other
attributes of any word in later editions to suit their own ideology. Remember
when Gough Whitlam was castigated publicly for calling a kilo-metre a kill
OM eta. Many dictionaries have changed (updated) since then to include the
false colloquialism.
Nevertheless Alan Esson was wrong to call himself a
racist, as he does not fit the above definition. He only helps to continue
the false conception of the word.
If I don't like the southern Latin races because they
stink of garlic or any other race because they may make me personally
uncomfortable, and as a result I discriminate against them (i.e. refuse to
serve them), THIS IS NOT A RACIST ACTION, because it has nothing to do with
superiority. I most certainly leave my self open to the the charge of
discrimination or intolerance, which may be even uncharitable, but it is
NOT racism as per the above definition.
As regards the definition itself, notice the qualifier,
"without scientific proof". Has anyone apart from Charles Darwin done a study
on the matter? Modern ideologists love to use Darwin in support of our
evolutionary ascendancy from the ape. Perhaps the illusive missing links
are amongst us today, many of whom seem to have taken over our
universities.
Almighty God Himself has elected the Jewish race as
His CHOSEN PEOPLE, and even though they may be out of favour (as are most
of the rest of us) at this moment, they are STILL His chosen people; and
that is enough evidence of superiority for me.
Philip Madsen.
Subject: Hawthorne Is Wrong
I Don't know who you are Scott. I suspect that I do
not care to meet you as I have many points of strong disagreement with the
policy of the One Nation Party. Just one small point, though, in case you
have not realised yet.
Hawthorn, Melbourne Victoria, is NOT spelled Hawthorne.
I can only conclude by raising my own personal concerns about the negative
effects of any One Nation presence in Australian political institutions.
Any country should be spared the ill-informed prejudices of those who do
not take the time to avail themselves of a range of perspectives, and instead
tend to be either consciously or (worse) unconsciously operating with the
prime motive of hate as their driving force. And who, to crown it all, have
the hubris to feel that 'they' are right. No one has an exclusive access
to 'truth'. Unfortunately, those who argue as badly as Pauline Hanson and
the cohorts of One Nation representatives I have had the ill-fortune to hear
speak, obviously do not have an inkling of this fact.
I have always had concern for Australia's future. Of
one thing I am certain: One Nation is NOT the answer. This is a Party that
is worse than the cynicism of the ALP and the Coalition, it is a party based
on ignorance, and which operates in ignorance of its ignorance.
Thanks for taking the time to read this if you have.
I have not been too specific, but there is plenty of information around,
everyone should take the time to read, widely, not narrowly or shallowly,
or with a baggage of HATE.
Finallly, again: HAWTHORN is NOT spelled
HAWTHORNE!
Alan
Swinburne Student Union
Subject:
Left
Link as an organ or tool of the ALP
To Scott Balson, and others involved in the 'GWB' (Global
Web Builders),
are you being deliberately cynical when you state that:
'"Left Link, Victoria's Broad Left Mailing List"...is proudly displayed as
a member of the Labor Party's ACTU. It is listed on the ACTU's "links"
page.'
While this may indeed be true, Left Link is in no way
a direct relation to the ALP. In fact Left Link would have a tenuous link
with the ALP at best. Left Link, is as stated, a Broad Left Mailing List.
It is used by Left activists of all persuasions to communicate and remain
updated about political, social and cultural goings on around Victoria and
indeed the world. There are a huge amount of activists who have nothing to
do with the ALP. Left Link is also NOT associated with organising violent
events.
The violence at the anti-Hanson rally at Hawthorn Town
Hall is regrettable, and was perpetrated as much by One Nation supporters
and members of the police force as it was orchestrated by any people on the
Left. You are peddling misinformation and lies. Is this just a generic fact
associated with the modus operandi of One Nation and other members of the
Right currently using this political Party as a handy mouthpiece.
Left Link is a loose range of Left activists. You are
incorrect when you make any claims about the 'orchestrated nature' of political
protests organised in any way using this mailing list. Again, there is little
if any connection between Left Link and the ALP Left, besides some, mainly
minor, cross-over of politics. Most Left activists are committed to non-violent
direct action.
Finally, I personally regret the fact that Pauline
Hanson was prevented from speaking. I think she is an inane public speaker,
and unless David E. has his hand up her arse and using her as a puppet, I
do not regard her speaking as a threatening event. If people are swayed or
influenced by her loose grasp of reality, or her very limited ability to
really understand or handle statistics, then good luck to them. There is
probably very little that could be done for such people in the first place.
I feel that she should have a right to speak. But given that she persists
in using (and apparently believing) the lies and misinformation that she
uses while engaging in her public speaking, then I can understand how individual
activists on the Left (or Anarchists) become upset enough to rally enough
to prevent her from speaking.
Please check your facts before making such ridiculous
claims and frankly stupid assertions with regard to political conspiracies
or "worrying new tendencies".
Yours sincerely,
Alan
Swinburne Student Union
Another perfect day in paradise.
Have a good one.
Recent stories exclusive to
(how to)
subscribe/rs of the Australian National News of the Day:
Hawthorn - where
the hooligans won - 21st July 1998
The Ipswich City
Council re-institute a ban against Pauline Hanson - 19th July 1998
The One Nation
mailing list published in the Australia/Israeli Review - 9th July
1998
The Barbara Hazelton
betrayal - 2nd July 1998
Pauline Hanson's
One Nation Queensland State MPs meet in Parliament - 27th June 1998
QANTAS censor Pauline
Hanson - 24th June 1998
"Paul" (Big "K")
Costello's lies - 22nd June 1998
Live coverage
of Queensland State Elections - 13th June 1998
Beattie's preference
lies exposed - 11th June 1998
Launch of
One Nation state policies - 8th June 1998
Sixty Minutes break
new barriers in unethical reporting - 6th June 1998
Ray Martin revelas
his spots when challenging Pauline Hanson on A Current Affair - 4th
June 1998
The backlash to
Ray Martin's unethical behaviour during his interview with Pauline
Hanson.- 4th June 1998
Return to Australian National
News of the Day
#
See GLOBE International for
other world news.
anotd
