Sunday 17th January 1999


This on-line paper is now archived for perpetuity in the National Library of Australia

Subscriber's password check (have your subscription number handy)
Subscribers get free access to the monthly "The Strategy" on-line from April 1998.

Current topical links (available to all readers):
[Links to the MAI]
[One Nation on-line DISCUSSION forum] [One Nation Web Site]
HAVE YOU ORDERED:
[MURDER BY MEDIA, DEATH OF DEMOCRACY IN AUSTRALIA]

from an Aussie's viewpoint on Australia's first daily Internet newspaper.
Since October 1995

Well why should we be surprised. The new National party leader in New South Wales, George Souris, personally selected by Deputy Prime Minister Tim Fischer decreed that One Nation be put last. The previous leader Ian Armstrong had called for Labor to be put last after One Nation.

His command has caused uproar in National circles. Steve Candsell the National candidate for the Labor seat of Clarence said, "I will look at the policies of all candidates before I decide where to put One Nation preferences. But Labor should go last as they have been very bad for the bush."

Another candidate, Steve Wilson running in the Labor seat of Bathurst said, "Labor is the problem in this state and we fighting to put them out of office. The Liberals will get my second preference but I am keeping my powder dry on what we will do with the rest."

Yesterday Mr Souris is believed to have rung every single National candidate demanding that they put One Nation last - saying that if they didn't it would be a serious test of his week-old leadership.

Now "wouldn't it be luverly" if One Nation put the Coalition parties last after Labor in the New South Wales State election - you would here bleating and chest thumping like never before as the right wing arm of the Laboral faction is guaranteed failure - One Nation with about 12% of the vote in certain areas would ensure the Liberal and National parties remained watching from the opposition.

Do this a few times and the so-called "moral decision" will become secondary to these career politicians as their CVs showed an ever lengthening time as failures in opposition.

La Rouche on Hanson's growing support

Here is an extract from that article:

Furthermore, Hanson's policies are rooted in the American struggle against British tyranny, as the best of the anti-British, anti-free trade "American System" of political economy was brought to Australia in the late 1880s by the exuberant Yankee, King O'Malley, founder of Australia's national bank.

`Economic rationalism'

Virtually all Australian commentators have attributed Hanson's burst into prominence to the electorate's disgust with "economic rationalism," the term by which the deregulation, privatization, globalization, etc. policies of the Mont Pelerin Society, the chief economic warfare unit of the British Crown, are known downunder, which have dominated both major parties since shortly after Mont Pelerin set up its first Australian think-tanks in 1975.

Nasty boy in focus

I get a lot of hate mail - but this one deserves special mention. It has been censored. Pyne's posts are in purple (first at the bottom of this section. My response to his first post is in red.

Scott Balson,

Don't think for one minute that you can scare me you son-of-a-bitch.

I have received death threats from your cronies. We even received a death threat against our whole family. One night I laid awake expecting a gun shoot through the window from one of your freaking 'gun nuts'. But I said f*** it, My family has been standing up to scum like you for years, and will never stop.

I would dare you to sue me for defamation! We have enough information on lies and fabrications spread by your scumbags in Cairns to bury them.

You'r whole f***ing party is dead in the water arse hole.

Robert Pyne
CAIRNS - 4th generation citizen of this fine city.

P.S. Go f*** yourself!

At 05:10 16/01/99 +1000, you wrote:
>Yes and you are now a prime candidate for a defamation action.

>Thank you for providing your address which I presume is correct?

>Scott Balson
>Pauline Hanson's One Nation webmaster

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Pyne
>To: qld@onenation.com.au
>Date: Friday, 15 January 1999 9:27
>Subject: ONE NATION

>>FIRST I HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR CRAP.

>>YOU PUT FORWARD ARSE-HOLES AS CANDIDATES.

>>IF HANSON HAD HALF A BRAIN SHE WOULD BE DANGEROUS:-
>>- WHAT IS THE SEPERATION OF THE POWERS PAULINE?
>>- WHAT IS THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT?
>>- DOES AUSTRALIA HAVE A BILL OF RIGHTS?
>>- WHAT IS NATIONAL SOCIALISM?
>>- WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE SPEAKER?
>>- WHO WAS ISAAC ISAACS?
>>- WHAT IS YOUR POLICY ON MICRO ECONOMIC REFORM?

>>BETTER ASK DAVID, BECAUSE YOU WOULDN'T HAVE A F***ING CLUE!

>>YOU'R A MOB OF FASCIST F***WITS AND YOU WOULDN'T KNOW YOUR ANKLE FROM YOUR >>ARSE-HOLE!

>>ROB PYNE.

>>P.S. GO AND GET F***ED!
>>Rob Pyne
>>8 Amazon Close
>>Whiterock Q 4868
>>Tel: 07 4036 0376

The background to the court challenge against the changes preventing Australians using the Langer method of voting:

To sum up the judgment.. A preference ceases to be a preference if it is given to more than one candidate. This is a nonsense. For instance, we are all aware of preference shares where thousands of people may be issued identical preference shares.

When I filed the appeal against this judgment thirteen days after the hearing, it was accepted and the $1011 fee paid. But it was to late as the matter had been determined on an interlocutory basis and an appeal must be filed within seven days in an interlocutory matter.

In other words the appeal must be filed 6 days before the written judgment is available. An application to have an appeal out of time was made and refused.

The Constitutional matter originally filed remains on foot in the High Court awaiting a hearing date.

The federal court judgment is so obviously wrong it is laughable. But the question is not finally resolved until the High Court hears the case.

What the Federal Court judgment and the appeal refusal did, was allow the 1998 election to proceed illegally or otherwise and at the same time deny a citizen a right to justice.

One problem with Australian law, is that bad judgments stand until somebody with sufficient funds ( Hundreds of thousands) decides to challenge. But the major problem is the courts deliver legal decisions as opposed to just decisions. The cause, is there is no longer a basis for/of justice in Australian law.

Justice and mercy and for that matter the Australian way of a fair go are no longer a part of our court system. Our Courts were once (not any longer) under the Crown as separate to government, the Crown was bound to deliver justice, governments are not. This separation of power is one of the most fundamental to the continuing delivery of justice. Government must not control the courts nor the courts control government, as is the case with The High Court. The system we borrowed has been manipulated to suit vested interests. The system we believe we have, we don’t fact have. There is nowhere in the British system where a court of any standing has been placed over the parliament, except in Australia.

Tongue in cheek look at the battle of the sexes:

• A man will pay $2 for a $1 item he needs.
• A woman will pay $1 for a $2 item that she doesn't need.
• A woman worries about the future until she gets a husband.
• A man never worries about the future until he gets a wife.
• A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend.
• A successful woman is one who can find such a man.
• To be happy with a man, you must understand him a lot and love him a little.
• To be happy with a woman, you must love her a lot & not try to understand her at all.
• Married men lived longer than single men, but married men are a lot more willing to die.
• Men wake up as good looking as they went to bed.
• Women somehow deteriorate during the night.
• A woman marries a man expecting he will change, but he doesn't.
• A man marries a woman expecting that she won't change, and she does.
• A woman has the last word in any argument. Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument.
• There are 2 times when a man doesn't understand a woman - before marriage and after marriage.

The elites on line - a list of the Bildeberg's and others.

For your consideration and active criticism,

"The Australian Constitution relies for it's force upon the Governor-General's assent to parliamentary bills in the name of the UK Crown. The Australian Constitution is section 9 of UK legislation "The British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)" to operate under the sovereignty of the UK (section 2) and therefore is UK law. The UK says we are independent. The UN says we must have been independent since the date of joining that organisation in 1945. Thus, sovereignty changed from the UK to the citizens of Australia. The Parliament of Westminster said (UK Immigration Act Amendment Bill (UK) 1973), citizens of Commonwealth countries are alien. As an Australian citizen the UK does not recognise you other than as an alien and thus you are not represented in Westminster and neither can you vote in the UK. The Parliament in Canberra is subordinate to the Parliament of Westminster (per Hayne. J, High Court Melbourne 21st December 1998) under section 5 of the Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia. The Parliament of Australia remains totally dependent on this UK legislation, with sovereignty vested in the UK.

Any person responsible for the administration of a government department in Australia, making an attempt to enforce any legislation derived from the now defunct UK Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia and its section 9, also known as the Australian Constitution, will provide prima facie evidence of having willfully and knowingly breached International law.

These are Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind and involve the government "Officer" directly in the political suppression of your right to self-determination (see sections 1, 2, 55, 56 of the UN Charter, the International Declaration of Human Rights 1948, the 1971 International Court of Justice, Namibia Decision, The International Convention on Civil and Political Rights 1966). (exactly as Australia has been arguing over the years for Cambodia and other countries).

It is brought to your attention that the penalties for enforcing the law of the UK in Australia are severe and involve incarceration. You are further advised that while the UN's International Criminal Commission is slow to act, it proposes to deal with Master Terry Connolly, a judge of the ACT Supreme Court, after the Bosnia trials are completed, which appears to be during 1999. Australians are already preparing to directly pursue the individuals responsible for imposing UK law upon Australian citizens after the new Constitution is voted upon by the Australian people, who are already sovereign. All legislation, in the new Constitution, "shall be the demonstrable will of the people" with emphasis on demonstrable. Politicians will not be able to vote against their electorate wishes. This means power transparency in parliament - no doubt a novel thought for the kitchen cabinet and the parties! This Constitution will be presented to the Australian people through the UN and not by illegitimate Australian politicians.

The highest form of treason has been committed and is being committed on a daily basis in Australia by the "authorities" who unwittingly supply the prima facie evidence of high treason.

The authorities for this are, Articles 51 and 104 of the UN Charter, the former, individual and collective self-defense, the latter, contrary to the "Hayne" decision, an authority to override municipal law.

The word treason sounds extreme, however it is the only description and an increasing number of High Court judges, Governors, politicians and other enforcers will feel the full force of the law in due course.

(donated by a group member)

from the global office:

Another perfect day in paradise.

Have a good one.

This Ring Name site is owned by One Nation. Want to join the One Nation ring? [Skip Prev] [Prev] [Next] [Skip Next] [Random] [Next 5] [List Sites]

exclusive to  (how to) subscribe/rs of the Australian National News of the Day:

One Nation's Queensland State Conference - 27th to 29th November
Dual Citizenship and politicians- 20th November 1998
Where Prize Turkeys Gather - 17th November 1998
A time with Heather Hill - exclusive interview with One Nation's first Federal Representative - 25th October 1998
A day with Pauline - exclusive interview after the Federal Election - 22nd October 1998
It's YOUR ABC? - 17th October 1998
The Federal Election - 3rd October 1998
One Nation launch - the day the media snapped.- 29th September 1998
Pauline Hanson defeats the politically correct lobby- 28th September 1998
Fairfax on trial- 23rd September 1998
Where the politically correct hang out - 20th September 1998
A brief lunch time controntation with Jeff Kennett- 8th September 1998
One Nation's Primary Industry Policy- 7th September 1998

Return to Australian National News of the Day

#

See GLOBE International for other world news.